Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Comparing Dirt and Synthetic Horse Racing Tracks

An entrepreneur in the horse racing industry,Nelson Clemmens  is the founder of AmWest Entertainment, LLC, the provider of AmWager off-track betting solutions. Nelson Clemmens has a longstanding passion for Thoroughbreds and participates in the University of Arizona’s annual Global Symposium on Racing.

One topic addressed at the December, 2019 Symposium was “Continuing the Quest for the Safest Racing Surface: Taking Another Look at Synthetic Surfaces.” Having been introduced in North American racetracks approximately 15 years ago, synthetic tracks have garnered mixed reviews.

The Tapeta surfaces placed on Southern California tracks, such as the track at Santa Anita, were ultimately removed because of perceived inconsistency and drainage issues. Tapeta surfaces remain in place in locations such as Woodbine in Toronto, Canada and Golden Gate Fields in Northern California.

According to the Symposium’s presenter on this topic, synthetic tracks have evolved significantly over the past decade and now offer a safety profile that is similar to, or even better than, traditional dirt surfaces. With fewer tendon injuries occurring on synthetic tracks, these surfaces are substantially better for horses running at top speed.

Persistent challenges with dirt tracks include ensuring that banking is consistent, and that the track performs well in wet conditions. Sealing the track’s surface is one option, but this compacts the earth and reduces cushioning. With these considerations in play, tracks like Santa Anita are currently considering options such as fibersand or other synthetic surfaces.